State v. Freeman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
The defendant brings forward assignments of error in which he contends that the indictment for first degree kidnapping is fatally defective and that the trial court erred in denying him the right to exercise a peremptory challenge. We conclude that the indictment for kidnapping is not defective. The trial court’s error in denying the defendant the use of his remaining peremptory challenge, however, entitles him to a new trial.
The State presented evidence which tended to show that on the evening of March 24, 1984, the victim returned to High Point from a vacation. As she was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.