State v. Dudley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
The defendant first assigns error to the court’s failure to declare a mistrial ex mero motu after a statement on direct ex*658amination by James R. Rose, an officer with the Atlantic Beach Police Department, who investigated the case. After the defendant had been interrogated by the investigating officers he was transported to the Beaufort, North Carolina magistrate’s office. Mr. Rose testified that on the way to the magistrate’s office the defendant without being questioned said “that if he did this, that he shouldn’t live any longer; he should die.” When they arrived at the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. GobalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. PakulskiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. MulderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.