Legal Opinion
Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. Nesbitt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 26, 1931No. 28,439PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover for the breach of an executory contract for the purchase of potato bags by the defendant from the plaintiff. There was a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment for the defendant entered on the verdict.
The plaintiff is a manufacturer and dealer in burlap potato bags. On or about March 5, 1929, it made an executory contract of sale with the defendant for 50,000 bags . of a specified size at $118.25 per thousand f. o. b. cars Minneapolis, shipments to be made during September—December, 1929, with sight draft attached to bill of lading. The burlap…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moskow v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Scheerschmidt v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Reinkey v. Findley Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Valley Planing Mill Company v. Lena Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Lynch v. HigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brooks v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Rooney v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Zane v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Hafiz v. Midland Loan Finance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Kremer Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.