Legal Opinion

Marx v. Williamsburgh City Fire Ins.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1916No. Docket No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Frank Marx against the Williams-burgh City Fire Insurance Company upon a policy of fire insurance. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

(after stating the facts). 1. The statute relied upon is an amendment of section 2 of Act No. 313, Pub. Acts 1887, entitled:

“An act to provide for the taxation and regulation of the business of manufacturing, selling, keeping for sale, furnishing, giving, or delivering spirituous and intoxicating liquors, and malt, brewed, or fermented liquors and vinous liquors in this State, and to repeal all acts or parts of acts inconsistent with the provisions of this act.”

*502It contains the following (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 7032) :

“Nor shall such wholesaler enter into any contract, agreement or other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Koppitz-Melchers Brewing Co. v. BehmMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Dierkes v. WidemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gordon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Zane v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Cook Motors Corp. v. Casualty Ass'n of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Leach v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Wilds v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API