Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 23, 1990No. 20797-1-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.

Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company appeals from a judgment in favor of Harold and Violet Marsh for $288,773.14. Commonwealth, as escrow agent, recorded a deed of trust containing an incorrect legal description. Commonwealth corrected the legal description and rerecorded the deed of trust within 90 days of the Marshes filing for bankruptcy. The deed of trust was security for a major loan to the Marshes. The recording and rerecording created the possibility the rerecording could be avoided as a preference in bankruptcy. This would result in the property in question becoming an asset in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Glaser v. HoldorfWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Paganelli v. SwendsenWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Nelson v. SponbergWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Peterson v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Seattle v. BlumeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. City of Seattle v. BlumeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Flint v. HartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API