Legal Opinion
City of Seattle v. Blume
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1997No. 64462-4PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
947 P.2d 223 (1997)
The CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, Respondent,
v.
Bruce BLUME and Ann Stever Blume, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Petitioners.
No. 64462-4.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued May 27, 1997.
Decided November 13, 1997.
Adolph & Bintinger, Robert Adolph, Paul Bintinger, Seattle, for Petitioners.
Mark Sidran, Seattle City Atty., Phillip Brenneman, Marcia M. Nelson, Asst. City Attys., Seattle, for Respondent.
MADSEN, Justice.
Petitioners, Bruce and Ann Stever Blume, filed a counterclaim for damages against the City for intentional…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Washburn ex rel. Estate of Roznowski v. City of Federal WayWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- VersusLaw, Inc. v. Stoel Rives, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.