Legal Opinion

Paganelli v. Swendsen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1957No. 33852PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

In this quiet title action, we are confronted with the questions of whether the defendant, Wier Hostetler, is a good-faith purchaser and whether defendant Hugh-banks, Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as Hugh-banks), is a good-faith mortgagee.

Laws of 1927, chapter 278, § 2, p. 671 (cf. RCW 65.08.070, Rem. Rev. Stat., § 10596-2), provides that an unrecorded deed is void as against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee in good faith and for a valuable consideration from the same vendor, his heirs, or devisees, whose conveyance is first duly recorded. The reason for such legislation, and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daly v. RizzuttoWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Biles-Coleman Lumber Co. v. LesamizWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bernard v. BensonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Cunningham v. Norwegian Lutheran Church of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Tjosevig v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Glaser v. HoldorfWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hudesman v. FoleyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hendricks v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Peoples National Bank v. Birney's Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API