Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Blume

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1997No. 64462-4PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Madsen J.

Petitioners, Bruce and Ann Stever Blume, filed a counterclaim for damages against the City for intentional interference with a business expectancy for the City’s alleged delays in processing their building permit. They appeal a Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s dismissal of their counterclaim. We reverse and remand.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

In February 1987, Bruce and Ann Stever Blume applied *246to the City of Seattle Department of Construction and Land Use (DCLU) for a Master Use Permit (MUP) to build an office/research facility known as “University Center Phase II”…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Washburn ex rel. Estate of Roznowski v. City of Federal WayWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. VersusLaw, Inc. v. Stoel Rives, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API