Legal Opinion

Hill v. . Snider

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Counsel for appellant, in brief filed in this Court, states that: “At the hearing the defendant demurred ore tenus to one cause of action on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and in the .other to the jurisdiction of the court. His Honor sustained the demurrer and signed a judgment dismissing the action in which he called the first cause of action second, and the second the first.” Considering the rulings of the court as set forth in judgment below, in the light of the pleadings, it is patent that the ruling with respect to failure…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lunn v. . ShermerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Robertson v. HaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Stone v. Doctors' Lake Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Leggett Electric Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Schlieper v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Cotton Mills v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Patuxent Development Co. v. BeardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Parker v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API