Legal Opinion

Parker v. White

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 11, 1952No. 450PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Does this action affect the title to real property ? If it does, the judgment from which this appeal is taken would be in error. But if it does not, then the judgment is correct and should be affirmed. For the filing of the notice of the action, that is, Us pendens, is authorized only in actions affecting the title to real property. G.S. 1-116. From a careful consideration and analysis of the various phases of the complaint, in the light of applicable principles of law, it seems apparent that the purpose of this action is to recover damages caused by fraud. Hence, error in the judgment is not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Bolich v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Fields v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. F. E. Lykes & Co. v. GroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cofield v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Collier v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Cutter v. CUTTER REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Keith v. WilderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API