Robertson v. Halton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Ferguson, J., at February Term, 1911, of CRAVEN. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Walker.
1Opinion of the CourtWalxer, J.
Tbis action was brought to recover damages in tbe sum of $125 for deceit and false warranty in a borse trade, and was tried upon issues wbicb, witb tbe answers thereto, are as follows:
1. Did tbe defendant procure tbe exchange of bis mule for plaintiff’s mare by fraud and misrepresentation, as alleged in tbe complaint? Answer: Yes.
2. If so, what damages is plaintiff entitled to recover by reason thereof? Answer; $50.
3. Did defendant procure tbe exchange of bis mare for tbe mule swapped him by plaintiff by fraud and misrepresentation, as alleged in tbe complaint? Answer: Yes.
é. If so, what…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Jeffrey v. BigelowNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- National Bank & Loan Co. v. PetrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Troitino v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Fields v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Palomino Mills, Inc. v. Davidson Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Gray v. . CartwrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Hoke v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.