Legal Opinion

Craven v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 1987No. 22734PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

Appellant Charles N. Craven (Mr. Craven) commenced this action seeking recovery for personal injuries suffered as a result of an automobile accident. Appellant Susan Craven (Mrs. Craven), by a separate action, sought damages for loss of consortium. Both cases were consolidated for trial. The jury returned a verdict of $6,100 for actual damages in favor of Mr. Craven, but denied Mrs. Craven damages in her suit. Appellants moved for a new trial, alleging the verdicts were inconsistent. Mr. Craven also motioned for a new trial ad-ditur on the grounds that the verdict in his case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  2. South Carolina State Highway Department v. ClarksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. King v. Daniel International CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. General Electric Co. v. Lions GateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. Prego v. HobartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Gruber v. Santee Frozen Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Lee v. BunchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Steele v. DillardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Sullivan v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API