Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Davis
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 30, 1995No. 2295PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Connor, Judge:
These are negligence actions. While passing an eighteen wheeler on a two-lane road, Hazel Porter struck a utility-truck which was attempting to turn left. Albert Sullivan was a passenger in Porter’s car.
Albert brought an action for his injuries, and Dorothy, his wife, sued for loss of consortium. Defendants included Hazel Porter (the automobile driver), Cornel Davis (the utility truck driver), and Mid-Carolina Electric Cooperative (Davis’ employer).
In Albert’s case the jury returned a verdict for Albert for $20,000 against only Hazel Porter and found for Davis and Mid-Carolina.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Toole v. TooleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Allstate Insurance v. DurhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Dunn v. Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Floyd v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Seabrook Island Property Owners' Ass'n v. BergerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Lee v. BunchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Davis v. TrippCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.