King v. Daniel International Corporation
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Respondent’s negligence action was initiated to recover for injuries she sustained as she was leaving work. Respondent fell in the Michelin Tire Corporation parking facility which appellant was constructing. Finding appellant negligent, the jury awarded respondent one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) actual damages. Appellant’s motions for summary judgment, directed verdict, judgment n.o.v., or in the alternative for a new trial were all denied. We affirm.
In August 1973 Michelin Tire Corporation contracted with appellant to have it construct a processing plant in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Young v. WarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Bruno v. Pendleton Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Nolan v. DaleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- House v. European Health SpaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Edward's of Byrnes Downs v. Charleston Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hutson v. Cummins Carolinas, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Howle v. PYA/Monarch, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Easler v. HEJAZ TEMPLE OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Kunst v. LoreeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Boone v. Huntington & Guerry Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.