Legal Opinion

Prego v. Hobart

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 1, 1985No. 0571PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

This is a tort action. Respondent Laura E. Prego, a minor, sued appellants Frederick James Hobart and F&S Wholesale Corporation seeking damages for injuries sustained when Hobart’s automobile collided with the bicycle she was riding. Respondent Joseph E. Prego, Laura’s father, sued Hobart and F & S to recover Laura’s medical expenses. The actions were consolidated for trial. The jury returned a verdict against Laura on her claim, and found for her father on his claim for her medical expenses. The trial court ordered new trials based on inconsistent verdicts. Hobart and F&S appeal.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lorick & Lowrance, Inc. v. Julius H. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Griffin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Craven v. CunninghamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Glenn v. 3M CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API