Prego v. Hobart
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Shaw, Judge:
This is a tort action. Respondent Laura E. Prego, a minor, sued appellants Frederick James Hobart and F&S Wholesale Corporation seeking damages for injuries sustained when Hobart’s automobile collided with the bicycle she was riding. Respondent Joseph E. Prego, Laura’s father, sued Hobart and F & S to recover Laura’s medical expenses. The actions were consolidated for trial. The jury returned a verdict against Laura on her claim, and found for her father on his claim for her medical expenses. The trial court ordered new trials based on inconsistent verdicts. Hobart and F&S appeal.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lorick & Lowrance, Inc. v. Julius H. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Griffin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Craven v. CunninghamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Glenn v. 3M CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023