Legal Opinion
Prince v. Selby Smelting Lead Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1917No. Civ. No. 2247PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action by plaintiff, as a real estate broker, to recover commission alleged to be due him for effecting a sale of real estate belonging to the defendant.
There is no dispute as to the facts, and the proposition of law involved is simple. The following is a brief synopsis of the steps in the transaction: On May 28, 1914, the defendant gave to the plaintiff a letter which in effect provided that if certain options theretofore given to plaintiff by the defendant, and which by their terms expired on June 15, 1914, were accepted, plaintiff should be allowed five per cent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seymour v. St. Luke's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Larson v. BurroughsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Seymour v. St. Luke's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Dunne v. ColombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Dallas Dome Wyoming Oil Fields Co. v. BrooderWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- Mitchell v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Harris v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923