Mernin v. Cory
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. M. K. Harris, W. D. Turner, and Goodfellow & Eells, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of the malpractice of the defendant as a dentist. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for two thousand dollars, and judgment was rendered for that amount. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
We do not see any sufficient ground for maintaining appellant’s contention that the verdict was not supported by the evidence. There is no room for doubt that the extraction of one of plaintiff’s teeth by defendant resulted in…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Neuber v. Royal Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Ley v. BishoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hurlburt v. GillettNew York Supreme Court · 1916
- Palmer v. CraftsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.