Legal Opinion

Engleman v. City of Kalamazoo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1925No. Docket No. 14PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Defendant city gave plaintiff notice to remove, within 30 days, a stairway leading from the street to the basement of his business block situate at the corner of Burdick and Water streets. Plaintiff responded by filing this bill to restrain defendant from enforcing its order. From an adverse decree plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff’s grantor, Nicholas Baumann, erected the block in the year 1870. It has three stories and a basement. The ground and basement floors have always been used as business places. The two upper stories are used as living quarters. When the building was constructed two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Cecelia Society v. Universal Car & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Crosby v. City of GreenvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Berkey & Gay Furniture Co. v. Valley City Milling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Clement v. BettleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  5. Pastorino v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marlette Auto Wash LLC v. Van Dyke Sc Properties LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Dyer v. ThurstonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Haab v. MoormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API