Legal Opinion

Haab v. Moorman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1952No. Docket 6, Calendar 45,095PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from obstructing a vacant areaway lying between the properties of the respective parties in the city of Ypsilanti. For an understanding of the issues, we i attach a rough sketch of the area in dispute, the ■ subject of this litigation, and also of the neighboring

property. For brevity we refer to the disputed property as an alley. Otto and Oscar Haab, Peter Karson and John Atsalas, plaintiffs, were the' owners of the properties on the north side of Michigan avenue in Ypsilanti, Michigan, as shown by the sketch. Atsalas died after the suit was begun and the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. St. Cecelia Society v. Universal Car & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Crosby v. City of GreenvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Berkey & Gay Furniture Co. v. Valley City Milling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Zemon v. NetzorgMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Frawley v. ForrestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weber v. Johnston Fuel Liners, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Widmayer v. LeonardMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Marlette Auto Wash LLC v. Van Dyke Sc Properties LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Dyer v. ThurstonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Reed v. SoltysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API