Dyer v. Thurston
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs-appellants and defendants-appellees are adjoining landowners. At one time both properties were owned by one owner. For a good number of years in the past there had been joint use by the residents of the two properties of a path that runs from defendants’ property, across plaintiffs’ property, and thence to a lake. Plaintiffs in 1967 became unwilling to allow defendants to use the pathway and constructed a fence across their property. Defendants took down the fence and continued to use the pathway.
The lower court, sitting without a jury, found that defendants had a prescriptive…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Von Meding v. StrahlMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Village of Manchester v. BlaessMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Haab v. MoormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Engleman v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tolksdorf v. GriffithMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Higgins Lake Property Owners Ass'n v. Gerrish TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Killips v. MannistoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Slatterly v. MadiolMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Goodall v. Whitefish Hunting ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.