Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Thurston

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1971No. Docket 9981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-appellants and defendants-appellees are adjoining landowners. At one time both properties were owned by one owner. For a good number of years in the past there had been joint use by the residents of the two properties of a path that runs from defendants’ property, across plaintiffs’ property, and thence to a lake. Plaintiffs in 1967 became unwilling to allow defendants to use the pathway and constructed a fence across their property. Defendants took down the fence and continued to use the pathway.

The lower court, sitting without a jury, found that defendants had a prescriptive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Von Meding v. StrahlMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Village of Manchester v. BlaessMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Haab v. MoormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Engleman v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tolksdorf v. GriffithMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Higgins Lake Property Owners Ass'n v. Gerrish TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Killips v. MannistoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Slatterly v. MadiolMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Goodall v. Whitefish Hunting ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API