Legal Opinion
In re Ian D.
New York City Family Court
Decided May 28, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Daniel D. Leddy, Jr., J.
This is a proceeding initiated by the board of education wherein it is alleged that the respondent, Ian D., is a person in need of supervision in that he “has been absent from school 121 days from September 8, 1980 to May 5, 1981.” (Family Ct Act, § 712, subd [b].) At the fact-finding hearing, the Law Guardian conceded that Ian has been absent from school as stated in the petition. However, testifying in his own behalf, Ian maintained that he was unable to attend school because of constant abuse from other students who ridiculed him about his being…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- People v. SandgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- In re Albert B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re Iris R.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Oliver v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Andrew R.New York City Family Court · 1982
- In re Barbara M.New York City Family Court · 1985
- In re Anthony C.New York City Family Court · 1989
- Simon v. DoeNew York City Family Court · 1995