Legal Opinion

In re Anthony C.

New York City Family Court

Decided February 24, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Damian J. Amodeo, J.

In this Family Court Act article 7 proceeding the presentment agency seeks a declaration that respondent is a person in need of supervision. It is alleged that respondent failed to attend school in accord with the provisions of part I of article *47665 of the Education Law. A hearing was held on January 13, 1989.

Following submission of a certified transcript of respondent’s attendance record for the 1987-1988 school year, the presentment agency rested (see, Matter of John R., 79 Misc 2d 339, 345). That transcript indicated more than 50 unexcused absences…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Andrew R.New York City Family Court · 1982
  2. Ossant v. MillardNew York City Family Court · 1972
  3. In re John R.New York City Family Court · 1974
  4. In re Barbara M.New York City Family Court · 1985
  5. In re Ian D.New York City Family Court · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Shena SS.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re Charles RR.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API