Legal Opinion

Simon v. Doe

New York City Family Court

Decided June 19, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Dennis F. Bender, J.

The above matter involves an allegation that the respondent is a person in need of supervision (PINS) in that she has not attended school in accordance with part I of article 65 of the Education Law (Family Ct Act § 712 [a]).

A fact-finding hearing was held on May 4 and May 5, 1995 upon the conclusion of which counsel for the petitioner and the Law Guardian were afforded an opportunity to make *380submissions. Such have been received and having considered the same and the evidence adduced at the hearing, I decide as follows.

There is no question but that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Andrew R.New York City Family Court · 1982
  2. Ossant v. MillardNew York City Family Court · 1972
  3. In re Barbara M.New York City Family Court · 1985
  4. In re Ian D.New York City Family Court · 1981
  5. In re Ruffel P.New York City Family Court · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Millis Public Schools v. M.P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  2. In re Jamol F.New York City Family Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API