Simon v. Doe
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Dennis F. Bender, J.
The above matter involves an allegation that the respondent is a person in need of supervision (PINS) in that she has not attended school in accordance with part I of article 65 of the Education Law (Family Ct Act § 712 [a]).
A fact-finding hearing was held on May 4 and May 5, 1995 upon the conclusion of which counsel for the petitioner and the Law Guardian were afforded an opportunity to make *380submissions. Such have been received and having considered the same and the evidence adduced at the hearing, I decide as follows.
There is no question but that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Andrew R.New York City Family Court · 1982
- Ossant v. MillardNew York City Family Court · 1972
- In re Barbara M.New York City Family Court · 1985
- In re Ian D.New York City Family Court · 1981
- In re Ruffel P.New York City Family Court · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Millis Public Schools v. M.P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- In re Jamol F.New York City Family Court · 2009