Legal Opinion

In re Iris R.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the petition dismissed, without costs to either party.

In this case the determination of the fact-finding hearing utilized as its basis the preponderance of evidence standard. The Corporation Counsel, with commendable candor, points out that this court has said, “ proof beyond a reasonable doubt is constitutionally required for an adjudication that a minor is a person in need of supervision (see, In re Winship, 397 U. S. 358) ” (Matter of Richard S., 27 N Y 2d 802). Counsel observes this would seem to require reversal. We…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Andrew R.New York City Family Court · 1982
  2. In re PriceNew York City Family Court · 1978
  3. In re Ian D.New York City Family Court · 1981
  4. In re Keith H.New York City Family Court · 1990
  5. In re Leif Z.New York City Family Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API