Legal Opinion

In re Albert B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 2, 1981PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mangano, J.

The primary issue on this appeal is whether the notice requirements of CPL 710.30 are applicable to a Family Court delinquency proceeding (Family Ct Act, art 7) in which a petitioner intends to offer at the fact-finding hearing evidence of a prior statement by respondent to a public servant (CPL 710.30, subd 1, par [a]) or testimony by a *252witness who has previously identified the respondent as the alleged delinquent in a confrontation arranged by police for the purpose of making such an identification. (See CPL 710.30, subd 1, par [b]; People v Berkowitz, 50 NY2d…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. OcasioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re Leo T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. People v. PalermoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. PinneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. In re Ian D.New York City Family Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API