Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Stiles

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1898PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from the District Oourt of Kay Ooimty; before A. G. G. Bierer, District Judge. Action by Harry C. C. Stiles against William E. Me Donald. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burb'ord, C. J.:

This was an action begun as unlawful entry and forcible detainer before a justice of the peace. The defendant in the justice’s court filed his answer, denying the allegations of unlawful entry, and of plaintiff’s right to possession, and.also set up equitable title in himself, and that the plaintiff held the real estate in question in trust for him. The answer was verified, and the justice certified the cause to the district court, under the provisions of section 7, article 1, chapter 67, Statutes Oklahoma 1893. In the district court, McDonald, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McNamara v. CulverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. City of Oklahoma City v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  3. Chisholm v. WeiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. HoweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. City of Altus v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Johnston v. BaldockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Anderson v. Ferguson and ZaringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  5. Northcutt v. BastableSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API