Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Baldock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1921No. Nos. 11730 and 11997 ConsolidatedPublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; James I. Phelps and Edward D. Oldfield, Judges. Action by J. T. Johnston against Nancy E. Baldoek for specific performance of contract to sell real estate. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Also action by Nancy E. Baldoek against J. T. Johnston and wife in forcible entry and de-tainer for possession of same real estate. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtPitobeford, J.

On the 2d day of December, 1919, the plaintiff in error instituted an action in the district court of Oklahoma county against the defendant in error to enforce the specific 'Performance of a contract for the sale of lots 25 and 26, in block 7, in Northwest addition to Oklahoma City. For convenience, the parties hereafter will toe designated *as they appeared in the trial court.

After the plaintiff had introduced his evidence the defendant filed a demurrer thereto, the grounds of the demurrer toeing: First, that the evidence was insufficient to entitle plaintiff to the relief demanded; second,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  2. Bradley v. OwsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Cobb v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McDonald v. StilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Baldwin v. SquierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lacy v. WozencraftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Ganas v. TselosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Columbus Club v. SimonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. McMonigle v. PoorhorseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Fry v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API