Jensen v. Gamble
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oceana; Sullivan, J. Assumpsit by Lewis Jensen against Joseph E. Gamble on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
This is an action of assumpsit commenced by declaration. In the introductory part of the declaration is the following averment:
“For that whereas, the said plaintiff avers that on, to wit, the 9th day of March, 1915, he was the owner of an undivided one-third of a promissory note, a copy of which is hereafter set forth.”
The remainder of the declaration consists of the common counts alleging that the indebtedness accrued to the plaintiff, without alleging any assignment or transfer to the plaintiff, from any person.
At the foot of the declaration there was the following notice:
“To the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hartford Fire Ins. v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Continental Insurance v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Vincent v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Dutton v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Achey v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Leslie v. MollicaMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- A. Krolik & Co. v. OssowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Wilkes v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Kruce v. Lakeside Biscuit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Jensen v. Oceana Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.