Legal Opinion

Dutton v. Shaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1877PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Saginaw Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, J.:

In this case Shaw had sold and delivered to Dutton several lots of staves, all at a price fixed by a contract, whereby Shaw was to deliver and Dutton to accept all the staves to be got out by Shaw in 1863.

After all the staves had been delivered, Shaw sued Dutton upon the contract, and the case went to judgment. During the trial Shaw failed, by reason of the absence or drunkenness of a witness, to prove an item of two thousand five hundred and forty-six staves, and that item he withdrew from the jury. He now sues Dutton to recover for the item thus withdrawn.

This item being within…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Clements v. ConstantineMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Goldfield Consolidated Milling & Transportation Co. v. Old Sandstorm Annex Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1915
  3. A. Krolik & Co. v. OssowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Miller v. Belvy Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  5. Coniglio v. Wyoming Valley Fire Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API