Legal Opinion

A. Krolik & Co. v. Ossowski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 20PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Wayne; Marschner (Adolph F.), J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Dey Krolik and others, copartners as A. Krolik & Company, against Bernice Ossowski for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiffs on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

In December, 1918, the defendant, then a retail merchant in Detroit, being indebted to plaintiffs, partners, wholesale dealers in dry goods, also of Detroit, in the sum of $2,981.63, on running or open account, was induced by plaintiffs, through Mr. Fixel, their credit man, in an effort to secure and collect their account, to execute and deliver to Mr. Fixel, as trustee for plaintiffs and other creditors, a chattel mortgage, in form somewhat of a bill of sale, covering defendant’s stock of merchandise, store fixtures and book accounts. The consideration named in the writing was $6,400.05,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Watkins v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Vincent v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Dutton v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Seyburn, Kahn, Ginn, Bess, Deitch & Serlin, PC v. BakshiMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Bergeron v. BuschMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Corey v. JarochMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API