Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Oceana Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1916No. Calendar No. 27,448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Mandamus by Lewis Jensen against James E. Sullivan, circuit judge of Oceana county, to compel the vacation of an order for security for costs in an action at law.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

In section 22 of part 1, Cummins & Beecher’s Michigan Judicature Act, under the subheading “Security for Costs,” it is stated the act provides “that on motion of the defendant all nonresident plaintiffs shall be, and all other plaintiffs in the discretion of the court may be, required to furnish security for costs.” This subject is treated in section *4078, chapter 13, of the act (Act No. 314, Pub. Acts 1915, 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12411), which, as read down to its concluding proviso, sustains the foregoing statement and confers upon the trial court substantially the same discretionary powers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campau v. GodfreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Jensen v. GambleMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People ex rel. Martin v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ypsilanti Charter Township v. KircherMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. United States Leather, Inc. v. Mitchell Manufacturing Group, Inc., Now Known as Mitchell Automotive, Inc. Mitchell Corporation of OwossoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Department of Treasury v. Bank of CommonwealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Emery v. TantMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Gamble v. Oceana Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API