Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1892PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error to Iosco. (Simpson, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

October 29, 1889, tbe plaintiff issued to Rix Bros., a grocery firm doing business in Oscoda village, its policy of insurance in tbe sum of $1,000. Tbe goods insured were contained in a two-story frame warehouse, located back of tbe firm's general store, and near tbe railroad operated and used by tbe defendant in this suit. January 30, 1890, a fire occurred by wbicb tbe property so insured was destroyed, and tbe plaintiff paid Rix Bros, on tbe policy for such loss tbe sum of $866.20, and took from them tbe following assignment:

“ Subrogation.
“Be it known that tbe Continental Insurance Company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. Hartford Fire Ins. v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Herriter v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Colvin & Van Patten v. CorwinNew York Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. MosesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Great Lakes Engineering Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  3. Powell v. . Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Robinson v. Township of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Mobile Insurance v. Columbia &c. R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1894

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API