Legal Opinion

Feykert v. Hardy

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1963No. Civ. 19786PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This is an action on a promissory note in which the makers, defendants and cross-complainants herein, while in effect admitting the unpaid balance, asserted by way of counterclaim and cross-complaint that the plaintiffs retained certain personal property of the defendants having a value in excess of such unpaid balance and claimed general, special and exemplary damages therefor. The court below rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and denied all recovery to the defendants and cross-complainants. We have concluded that its judgment should be affirmed.

The parties had been associated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neher v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Baird v. HodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Dell'Orto v. Dell'OrtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Fitzsimmons v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. City of Los Angeles v. County of MonoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hillman v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Pearson v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Polk v. PolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API