Legal Opinion
Shapoff v. Scull
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 20, 1990No. D009456PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
Summary
Defendants and appellants John Scull, Christopher Boomis and SERJ Corporation (SERJ) appeal from a judgment entered against them. The judgment, consisting of $55,000 for breach of contract, $50,000 in compensatory damages for intentional interference with contractual relations and $300,000 in exemplary damages, was in favor of plaintiff and respondent Stanley N. Shapoff. The judgment was based on jury findings SERJ had breached a development agreement with Shapoff and that the breach was caused by Boomis’s tortious interference.
Prior to submission of the legal…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Communist Party of the United States of Amerika v. 522 Valencia, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Wady v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Woods v. FOX BROADCASTING SUB., INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Webber v. Inland Empire Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.