Kimsey v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The appeal turns upon the sufficiency of count A. It is there disclosed that promptly upon due proof of disability of the insured, the defendant company began, and has continued, the stipulated monthly payments, and paid the premiums as well in strict accord with the policy provisions. This suit is to recover disability payments, and premiums paid prior to this time, rested upon the theory that recovery should be had from the date of disability, rather than from the time of furnishing due proof thereof. In support of this theory counsel for plaintiff present two lines of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- McGifford v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- McCutchen v. All States Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shears v. All States Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. SinquefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Standifer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1970
- Reingold v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936