Ivy v. Hood
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; J. J. Curtis, Judge. Bill by C. A. Ivy against J. W. Hood. Decree for defendant, and complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
Tbe trial judge states, as tbe issue, wbetber or not respondent did anything wbicb reasonably bad tbe effect of lulling complainant into a supposed “security of bis rights,” and thereby “caused him to fail to redeem” bis lands from tbe mortgage foreclosure within tbe statutory period.
[1] Tbe decree recites that tbe foreclosure deed of date January 24, 1912, made an exhibit to tbe bill, was duly recorded in February, 1912. Under our registration statute, this record was notice, not only of tbe fact of foreclosure (Gill v. More, 76 South. 453; Veitch v. Woodward Iron Co., 76 South. 124; Gamble…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Oden v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Peters Mineral Land Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Montgomery Enterprises v. Empire Theater Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Whiteman v. TaberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. McCreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.