Legal Opinion
McCutchen v. All States Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 18, 1934No. 6 Div. 584PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, Justice
(after stating the facts as above).
This court in two recent cases has dealt with policy provisions of similar import to those here involved.
The first of these (New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Reynolds, 217 Ala. 307, 116 So. 151, 152, 59 A. L. R. 1075) dealt with a stipulation in a policy of life insurance, saying: “ ‘ “If the insured, after payment of premium for one full year and before default in the xxayment of any subsequent premium, and before attaining the age of 65 years, and while this policy is in full force, shall furnish due proof to the company, at its home office in the city of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pfeiffer v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Whiteside v. North American Accident InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Berry v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Protective Life Ins. Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Shears v. All States Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Protective Life Ins. Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.