State v. Hickman

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in the charge in summarizing certain portions of the evidence relating to how the defendant broke into the drug store and what he stole. The State’s evidence showed that the store was entered *664through the skylight and that some eight Timex watches and a camera were stolen. There was also evidence that no windows or doors had been entered. The defendant was later arrested with eight Timex watches in his possession and subsequently signed a confession admitting the crime. The confession was admitted in evidence after a proper voir…