Legal Opinion
Wise v. Isenhour
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided August 5, 1970No. 7026SC416PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
Defendants made a motion for change of venue as a matter of right, by virtue of G.S. 1-76, before time for answering expired.
The pertinent portion of G.S. 1-76 reads:
“Where subject of action situated. — Actions for the following causes must be tried in the county in which the subject of the action, or some part thereof, is situated, subject to the power of the court to change the place of trial in the cases provided by law:(1) Recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form of such right or interest, and for injuries to real property.”
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Baruch v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Thompson v. HorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by8 opinions
- Asociacion De Reclamantes v. The United Mexican StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Gurganus v. HedgepethCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Smith v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Coastal Mall, Inc. v. AskinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Bradley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.