Legal Opinion

Smith v. One Super Wild Cat Console MacHine

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

This suit is in the nature of an in rem ① proceeding to declare certain described game machines confiscated under former ORS 167.555, and ordering their destruction by the sheriff of Umatilla County and delivery of any coins taken therefrom to the county treasurer. R. Whitey Schroth, the alleged owner of the machines, was named as a defendant. He demurred to the second amended complaint on the ground it fails to state a cause of action and further that “ORS 167.555(1) (2) (3) is null and void and inapplicable to defendant Schroth, in that it deprives him of his property without due process of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Daugharty v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. McKee v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. SoaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. JoyOregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Bozman v. OFFICE OF FIN., BALTO. CTY.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. State v. 25 Slot MacHinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Gaming Control Board v. Ten (10) Gaming DevicesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API