Legal Opinion

State v. Soasey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The defendant was indicted for violation of ORS 167.555, relating to the possession or operation of games of chance. The charging part of the indictment reads:

“The said MALCOLM SOASEY on or about the 14th day of May, A.D. 1963, in the County of Multnomah and State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully possess, display and operate for a profit in money of the United States of America, a certain game of chance, to-wit, a pin ball game, which said pin ball game was then and there operated and played by one Rex Elliott for a cash prize, * *

Defendant was convicted in a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Bobel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Barber v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. ChapinOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State v. O'NealSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. One Super Wild Cat Console MacHineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State v. McPhersonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. Stevens Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. Amador-HernandezOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  5. State v. Amador-HernandezOregon Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API