Legal Opinion
State v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 16, 1975No. 88063 & 88064PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
Defendant-bartender paid cash for “free games” won on an electric amusement device and was convicted of promoting gambling in the second degree, ORS 167.122.① Defendant contends that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal; (2) overruling his motion to suppress evidence; and (3) finding that the gambling device was subject to forfeiture and destruction under ORS 167.162. We affirm.
On June 19, 1974, a Portland police officer, dressed in plain clothes, went to a tavern and operated an electric amusement device. The defendant was present at the time…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hendrix v. McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. LanganOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. LanganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. HandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. LanganOregon Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.