Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. Banta

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9578PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case the appellees sued the appellants in a complaint of a single paragraph. The object of the suit was to obtain judgment on a promissory note executed by the -appellant Samuel Jarvis to the appellees, and a decree declaring a certain conveyance of real estate executed by said Samuel Jarvis to his co-appellants, John F. and Joseph R. Jarvis, to be fraudulent and void as against the creditors of said Samuel, .and particularly as against the appellees to whom he was then indebted, and setting aside said conveyance and subjecting ■the real estate to sale for the payment of their debt.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Bruker v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Kealing v. VansickleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Lockwood v. HardingIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. McLaughlin v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Minnich v. DarlingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Pennington v. FlockIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Boyce v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API