Legal Opinion

Bruker v. Kelsey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7192PublishedCited by 40 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— Complaint in two paragraphs by the appellee against the appellants, to set aside certain conveyances of real estate alleged to have been made in fraud of creditors. The appellants jointly,, and the appellant Josephine separately, demurred to each paragraph of the complaint, on account of the insufficiency of facts averred.

It is objected to each paragraph, that it does not show the insolvency of John Bruker, the grantor, either at the time the deeds were made, or at the time the suit was begun. The first objection is not well laid. Each paragraph contains the averment, that, at the time the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The Ocean National Bank v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Sherman v. HoglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Ewing v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Roberts v. MastersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. City of Huntington v. BreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Towns v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Baker v. State ex rel. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Winchester Wagon Works & Manufacturing Co. v. CarmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API