Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Graham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1883No. 10,666PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

-A motion to make a complaint more specific is a collateral one and belongs to that class which can only be brought into the record by a bill of exceptions or special order of court. Jarvis v. Banta, 83 Ind. 528.

"Where exceptions are taken to rulings made in forming issues on motions to strike out, to make more specific and the like, exceptions must be entered at the time the rulings are made, and leave must then be taken to reduce the exceptions to writing. There is a marked and important difference between rulings made during the trial, and those made upon the pleadings prior to issue…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Pitzer v. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Alcorn v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bement v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Indiana Horseshoe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. City of New Albany v. McCullochIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Noblesville Gas & Improvement Co. v. TeterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Kopelke v. KopelkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API