Legal Opinion
Mleczko v. Haynes Construction Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 23, 2008No. AC 29049PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The plaintiff, John Mleczko, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the finding and dismissal of his claim against the defendant Haynes Construction Company 1 by the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the board improperly affirmed the commissioner’s finding that his injuries were not compensable. We affirm the decision of the board.
The commissioner found the following facts. On Friday, November 12, 2004, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a project manager for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tracy v. Scherwitzky Gutter Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Spatafore v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Guiliano v. Daniel O'Connell's SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Mazzone v. Connecticut Transit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Woodley v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McFarland v. Department of Developmental ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Hummel v. Marten Transport, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Rauser v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011