Mazzone v. Connecticut Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is the compensability, under the Workers’ Compensation Act (act),1 of an injury to an employee that occurred on an employer’s premises during an unpaid lunch break. The claimant, Louis Mazzone, appealed from a decision of the compensation review board (review board) that had affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation *790commissioner (commissioner) denying the claimant’s application for workers’ compensation benefits. We transferred the claimant’s appeal from the Appellate Court to this court pursuant to Practice Book § 4023 and General…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Bernstein v. NemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lafayette v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Kolomiets v. Syncor International Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Cantoni v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- FRETT v. STATE FARM EMPLOYEE WORKERS' COMPENSATIONSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Parker v. Shaker Real Estate, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.