Legal Opinion

Levold v. Pederson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1924No. 18079PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered February 5,1923, dismissing an action on contract, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Levold, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking recovery upon an alleged commission contract, which he claims is a contract in writing, entered into by him with defendant, Pederson, in November, 1917. The cause comes to this court upon the appeal of Levold from a final judgment rendered against him by the superior court, after the sustaining of Pederson’s demurrer to Levold’s second amended complaint, upon the ground that the action has not been commenced within the time limited by law; Levold having failed to plead further. Our problem is as to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Keith v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Forland v. BoyumWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Engleson v. Port Crescent Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Foote v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Debritz v. SylviaWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. Bogle & Gates, PLLC v. ZapelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Aall v. Riverside Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bogle & Gates, P.L.L.C. v. ZapelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API