Legal Opinion
Forland v. Boyum
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1909No. 7987PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered December 5, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial before the court without a jury, in an action for a broker’s commission.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
On January 2, 1907, the following contract was entered into between C. B. Forland and Mary Boyum:
“Seattle, Wash., January 2nd, 1907.
“To C. B. Forland: In consideration of the sum of one dollar to me in hand paid and of the services to be performed by you in endeavoring to effect a sale of the following described property, viz., lot five (5), block eighteen (18), Sarah A. Bell’s Second Addition to the City of Seattle, with 14-room house, divided into three apartments, modern, I do hereby give and grant unto you for the period of thirty (30) days from date hereof and thereafter until withdrawn…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zimmerman v. ZehendnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Keith v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Foote v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Platt v. ButcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Farrell v. MentzerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Buratti & Montandon v. TennantTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Case v. RalphUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Engleson v. Port Crescent Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.