Bogle & Gates, P.L.L.C. v. Zapel
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
Ex parte writings may bring a contract within the six-year statute of limitations if they contain all the elements of a contract, including the promise of the party to be charged. Here, a law firm’s retention letter, which confirmed an oral agreement, did not express a promise by the firm’s client, and thus the letter did not *446satisfy the writing requirement for purposes of the six-year statute. Because the three-year statute for oral agreements applied to bar the firm’s contract claim, we vacate the award of summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS
This case differs from Bogle…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- DePhillips v. Zolt Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- DePhillips v. Zolt Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Kloss v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Cahn v. Foster & Marshall, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- McClung v. City of SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Bogle & Gates, PLLC v. ZapelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Mattingly v. Palmer Ridge Homes, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Mandery v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.